In article <170320081320180497%mitch@hawaii.rr>, Mitch <mitch@hawaii.rr> wrote:
> I sense an example is useful: > If you come across a table of food, it is not rewarding to ignore it, > assuming there is some obligation or punishment for eating food from > it. > Cynicism requires you to be suspicious. > You may avoid an obligation by eating of the food. > You won't ever get the benefit of the free food if you assume there is > a reason to suspect the opportunity, and avoid it.
That's the most tortuous ... oh never mind. You're never going to win any debates. I'm still not sure whether eating of the food is cynical or not eating of the food is cynical or simply saying "no thanks, I had a big breakfast" is the way to go.
Eating _of_ the food?
Why do Mac users lick their scroll balls? Because they can. -- W. Oates
