Back to Mac Usenet

From: epaton <epaton@null.com>
To: All
Subject: Re: why Cell processor was not
Date:Sat, July 05, 2008 10:41 PM


On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 14:33:36 -0500, xenon360 wrote:

> http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=23849
>
>
> http://xlr8yourmac.com/
>
> quote:
> "Also, all the cell people and the AMD people need to be quiet. Apple
> evaluated both. AMD has the same, if not worse, supply problems as IBM.
> Their roadmap is fine, but the production capacity is not.
>
> The tested Cell as well. That processor is NOT intended for PC
> applications. (it was designed for game systems, not as a general use CPU)
> The lack of out of order execution and ILP control logic creates very poor
> performance with existing software. Having developers rewrite for cell
> would have been MUCH more work than reworking for Intel. And that's what
> this is, you rework your codebase in ALL cases, not rewrite it. "

i may be wrong but doesnt amd have a substanitaly larger share of the
computer market than apple, their ability to produce cheaply enough to
give apple big discounts but i guess amd will be happy enough with
the highend.


5


Running TeleFinder Server v5.7.
© Copyright Spider Island Software