Maynard Handley wrote: > In article <krmdnRsF8vsaIjDfRVn-gA@comcast.com>, <Rage6c> wrote: > > NEWSFLASH: Chip optimized for task X performs better at task X than chip > optimized for task Y. > > Idiot. > While your _Newsflash_-statement stands undisputed, there is no need to go ad hominem. At least not as long TOP500 is published on a Linpack-score. :-)
