gmark wrote: > Wow, now that you mention it, if that's true, then no backup snapshot > would be > a true "snapshot", but rather a collection of files with a close range > of timestamps
I can't see how you could do anything else, TBH.
> distributed over the time it took to make that backup. So a faster > interface would > result in a smaller range of file sample times.
Right, but it will still always be a "blur" of what's on your filesystem unless you've got an infinitely fast interface :-)
