In article <290720080707163940%leave@me.alone>, Curmudgeon <leave@me.alone> wrote:
> Well unfortunately, what I see is: > > [adsl-70-131-83-28:~] steve% ls -lO / > ls: illegal option -- O > usage: ls [-ABCFGHLPRSTWZabcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1] [file ...] > [adsl-70-131-83-28:~] steve% > > which is why I tried "o" instead. Please advise . . . > I don't know what version of 'ls' you have. I know the man page for ls dated May 19, 2002 says the usage is: ls [-ABCFGHLPRSTW@abcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1] [file ...]
but if you read through the man mage, you find: -O Include the file flags in a long (-l) output.
listed in the options.
On the other hand, the version of ls that I have on my G3 running 10.4.11 does exhibit the behavior you describe.
