In article <tomstiller-AB4C1B.09123429072008@news.verizon.net>, Tom Stiller <tomstiller@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In article <290720080707163940%leave@me.alone>, > Curmudgeon <leave@me.alone> wrote: > > > Well unfortunately, what I see is: > > > > [adsl-70-131-83-28:~] steve% ls -lO / > > ls: illegal option -- O > > usage: ls [-ABCFGHLPRSTWZabcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1] [file ...] > > [adsl-70-131-83-28:~] steve% > > > > which is why I tried "o" instead. Please advise . . . > > > I don't know what version of 'ls' you have. I know the man page for ls > dated May 19, 2002 says the usage is: > ls [-ABCFGHLPRSTW@abcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1] [file ...] > > but if you read through the man mage, you find: > -O Include the file flags in a long (-l) output. > > listed in the options. > > On the other hand, the version of ls that I have on my G3 running > 10.4.11 does exhibit the behavior you describe.
Thanks, Tom. See my earlier reply to Chris Ridd. I am on 10.4.11 (albeit on a souped up Digital Audio G4).
Cheers!
Mudge
-- Life is change: How it differs from the rocks! I've seen their ways too often for my liking. New worlds to gain:ÊMy life is to survive . . . . . . and be alive for you.
