In article <190620080107285280%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> also, most discs these days are optimized for the higher burn speeds > and burning too slow is actually worse than burning closer to their > rated speed.
Now that I can actually read the disks that I produced in the computer I produced them in, I am perhaps running into that.
The two disks that were produced at the higher rate of speed can now be read. The one I produced at the slower rate can not be read, and acts like a blank.
Toast, thankfully, has a test burn speed feature to test the rate, if you are not familiar with the maximum rate that the burner can run without underrunning the buffer.
Considering the extensive discussion in the book about noise on the SCSI cables and that it might lead to multiple retries, I also thought the slower speed would produce a just as good if not better disk. That isn't what happened in my case!
-- -Glennl e-mail hint: add 1 to quantity after gl to get 4317.
