Back to Mac Usenet

From: dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusne
To: All
Subject: Re: Magnifying JPEGs viewed in
Date:Sat, July 05, 2008 10:33 PM


In article <slrng24pqr.g1r.g.kreme@cerebus.local>,
Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:

> In message <uce-473833.15244107052008@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>
> Gregory <uce@splook.com> wrote:

> > Depending on who "your" visitors actually are. About 1/6 of US users are
> > still at 56k or less. (Silly me. I think there's a substantial
> > difference between 17% and "nearly none."
>
> Based on my webserver logs (across a varied collection of sites, most
> not written by me but hosted by me) it is well under 5%.
>
> The 16-17% that have dialup are not cruising around the web. They are
> getting their email and going to a small handful of sites that they
> know, and that is all they are doing.

You need to be careful basing any world wide or even all America wide
trends on your own server logs.

> Even the very large sites like Amazon
> and Ebay are obviously not catering to the dialup user as those site have
> more and more images.
>

What these sites do and what is good practice are not the same thing.

> > Would you give me $100 every time I rolled a one on a die if I gave
> > you $10 every time I rolled 2-6?
>
> That does that have to do with anything? Are you saying a dialup user is
> just as likely to make a purchase online as a broadband user? Because
> if so, that is demonstrably false.
>

Why would you jump to a demonstrably false interpretation? There is a
simpler one staring us all in the face. That the dial up user is just as
worthy a person as a broadband user and only the ignorant or the
obsessively money minded website author would ignore the dial up user. I
say ignorant because there is a way to design so that it is win win for
all, you provide for bigger pics by linking to them. It is not an
either/or situation.


> Designing sites for the lowest common denominator merely impedes
> progress.

Designing for a win win for all is not designing for the lowest common
denominator. This is simply distorting the picture.

> I don't design for 640x480 screens, nor do I worry about 'web
> safe' colors because my assumption is that the vast majority of people
> have at least 1024x768 or better and are running with 16bit color.
> Likewise, the vast majority are not on dialup lines.

You should not be designing for any screen size. It is as simple as that.

--
dorayme


65


Running TeleFinder Server v5.7.
© Copyright Spider Island Software