Back to Mac Usenet

From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill
To: All
Subject: Re: SP3, to be or not to be : t
Date:Tue, July 29, 2008 11:27 PM


In comp.os.linux.advocacy, ¤–fhwÛ£f
<snuhwolf@netscape.net>
wrote
on Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:28:25 -0600
<PM000452E0B12BAA5E@unknown.unknown.dom>:
> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>> ¤–fhw¯£f, ye earth-vexing patched fool, thou cruel, ingrateful, savage
>> and inhuman creature, ye kvetched:
>>
>>> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:16:36 -1200, Kadaitcha Man aided th'
>> terraists with
>>> the following claims :
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ubuntu.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What if the OP has both IDE and a SATA drives?
>>>
>>> He'd be a rich man, thats for sure.
>>>
>>>> Hmmm? Even allowing the user
>>>> sufficient knowledge to set the BIOS to boot from the correct
>> drive, and
>>>> his
>>>> BIOS supporting drive boot order changes, your fucking precious
>> linsux is
>>>> going to fall over in a fucking screaming heap trying to install
>> the
>>>> utterly
>>>> fucked up GRand Unified Bootloader... a problem that's been around
>> in
>>>> ubuntu
>>>> since at least mid-2007 and still exists to this very day in the
>> very
>>>> latest
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So wahts preventing him from using LILO?
>>> :)
>>>
>>>> Who the fuck is the OP going to turn to when he needs to use
>> gparted to
>>>> set
>>>> the 1st ext partition flag for booting, you fuck-knuckled,
>> pinheaded,
>>>> linuxfucktard cunt?
>>>
>>> Any number of linux newsfroups I imagine :)
>>
>> And how the fuck is the poor cunt going to do that when he tried to
>> install
>> linsux to the IDE disk and GRuB fucking well went and scribbled all
>> over the
>> first 512 bytes of the MBR used by Windows on the SATA drive instead?
>>
> Well I would probably use a drivewiping utility but thats just me :)

Won't work. Forensics can detect traces of data even
after a number of overwrites. Granted, it's extremely
expensive to do so.

>
>> This is no fucking laughing matter. The linuxfux have built a fucking
>> Frankenstein, and to cover up for their ineptitude and complete and
>> utter
>> lack of foresight, they make idiotic excuses like "Linux is a tool.
>
> Its freedom! THROW OFF THE CHAINS TAHT BIND YUO!

No one is forced to use a computer. Admittedly, no one
was forced to buy gasoline or make plastics either
back in the days of Standard Oil, so one wonders;
in any event Standard Oil got broken up.

>
>> Windows
>> is an appliance", then they fucking whinge like poked piglets that
>> linsux
>> has only 1% of the market.

0.8%, though it depends on whose metrics one uses and what
submarket one is looking at. There are a number of
biases in the measurements.

>>
> I'm not wineing. I run it natively!
>
> BADA BING!
> BADA BOOM!

You are not running "Linux" natively. No one can.
The only thing that runs natively is part of the actual
Linux kernel; all other parts of the system are run through
a virtualization process (they call it "virtual memory"
for a reason, after all). An open() call does not open
a file; instead, it generates an illegal instruction trap;
the microprocessor then kicks things to the kernel, which
does the honors.

Fortunately for performance, any non-illegal instruction
is allowed to run, memory accesses permitting (an illegal
memory access results in another trap, which might tell
the kernel that it's time to write out a dirty page and
read in a fresh clean one -- or just kill the process with
a segfault signal).

>
>> Linsux has only 1% of the "market" because it can't be fucking given
>> away. It is free because no cunt in their right mind would fucking
>> well
>> pay for it.
>>
> Uhhhhhhhh...Ubuntus being sold at Best Buy in a box, fyi.

And how many boxes are they selling per month, compared to Vista?

One wonders.

>
>> I just checked the bug reports at ubuntu. The problem hasn't been
>> there
>> since mid-2007. It's been there for four fucking years, marked as a
>> high
>> priority problem because it totally fux0red some poor cunt's
>> TrueCrypt-encrypted disk by, wait for it, gouging huge holes in the
>> 1's
>> and putting the fucking detritus in the 0's contained in the first 512
>> bytes of the TrueCrypt volume header on a SATA disk, and it did that
>> even though the user told the fucking thing to install on his ATA
>> disk.
>>
> Freaky. When shit goes south on me I usually throw something :)
> THen I format everything in sight and try again.

Throwing a drive probably wouldn't do it much good. ;-)

>
>
>> The TrueCrypt/linsux victim must have been near fucking crying, I tell
>> you.
>
> The poor bastid :(
>
>> Fuck me dead, SATA has been around for fucking years and the
>> linuxfux still can't get it right. Total fucking incompetence, that's
>> what it is. A supercillious incompetence at that.
>>
> I've never seen a SATA drive up close.
> THey tell me they're nice thooough...

SATA drives are available, from the usual suspects:
Hitachi, Seagate, Western Digital, and Maxtor. A
quick Google coughed up:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/sata-hard-drives-run-riot,709.html

Hitachi DeskStar 7K250 (aka HDS722525)
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9
Western Digital Caviar SE (aka WD2500JD)

This is as of 2003. Newer models are probably available by
now; I myself have a 1.0 TB storage unit, though I don't
know if it's SATA or what (it uses Firewire to talk to
my laptop).

>
>> And it doesn't end there. The very same problem exists in OpenSuSE 11.
>> Goodness fucking knows how widespread the issue is. If you then try to
>> repair the very same b0rked GRuB linsux installation, OpenSuSE linsux,
>> in
>> all its fucking wisdom, tries to run debugreiserfs and fsck.ext2 on
>> completely unbroken NTFS volumes, for crying out fucking loud. Then it
>> throws its fucking hands up in the air and yells, "Quell horreur! I
>> can't
>> detect linsux volumes on the disk!"
>>
> Format the bastard.

NTFS? Naaah. That's got useful stuff on it. :-)

>
>> Well, fucking DUH!
>>
>> And why am I ranting like this? Because I just spent the last two
>> fucking
>> hours doing six installs of Ubuntu Hardy 8.04.1 and OpenSuSE 11 and
>> inummerable repair attempts - sitting here in complete total fucking
>> amusement as I watched linsux repeatedly try to fix unbroken NTFS
>> volumes with resierfs and ext2 tools. Gob-fucking-smacking incredible
>> that.
>>
> PArtition yer drives first? Run some better partition proggy like wot
> comes with Vector or ANY slack-based distro and be done with it.
> Not fancy at all. Pretty ugly to look at but it JUST WORKS.
> Slackware rules.

The drives in most SATA installations (and most other
installations, for that matter) are already partitioned.
If one wants to repartition them, fine -- ntfsresize can be used
(at some risk) or one can go with a proggie such as Partition Magic.

Caveat user. Make sure to do backups first if you're worried about it.

>
>> And the fix? Disconnect all the other drives except the one I want to
>> install to.
>
> Kewl. I'll do a hardhack in a heartbeat if it lets me give my brane a
> rest :)

This should not be necessary.

>
>> Over my fucking dead body. You show me one issue with
>> Windows
>> Vista that requires me to rip out all my fucking hard disks just to
>> install
>> it and I'll wring your fucking scrawny neck. Metaphorically, of
>> course.
>>
> Why would you want to install Vista in the first place?
>:(

Because it's better than XP, of course. Or at least newer.
I would have thought that super dooper obvious.

>
>> The result of all this fucking palaver with linsux is that BOTH - read
>> my
>> lips - BOTH of my RAID10 arrays are now doing a three fucking terabyte
>> rebuild. If the person doing the install tells linsux to install
>> itself on
>> sdj, as I did, after triple-checking that the correct drive serial
>> number
>> was selected, and after making 200% certain that the same serial
>> number was
>> the first boot device in the BIOS, then linsux should fucking well
>> install
>> its bootloader on sdj, not on sda, and not on sdf, as two independent
>> distributions just fucking well did to me.
>>
> Thats verry cromulant.
>
>> How fucking professional is that? No fucking wonder normal people
>> won't
>> use it. Fucking piece of shit, it is.
>>
> POOR PEOPLE USE IT!!!!1111!!!!

Poor people use whatever they can get, if they use 'puters
at all. I for one would suspect most of them use pirated
Windows installations or cast-offs.

>
>> I enjoyed that rant, it was like having a really good shit. I might
>> try to install linsux one more time... back shortly...
>>
> INSTALL BEOS!!!!!11111!!!!
> <check my headers>

I wonder when that will open-source. ;-)

--
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
/dev/signature: Not a text file
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **


17


Running TeleFinder Server v5.7.
© Copyright Spider Island Software